The court cannot supplant the wisdom of the academic bodies by way of directions that run contrary to the regulations.
Apex Court observed that Though the maxim ‘Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus’ is only a rule of caution and has not assumed the status of a rule of law in the Indian context, an attempt must be made to separate truth from falsehood and where such separation is impossible, there cannot be a conviction.
there cannot be two FIRs for the same transaction against the same person by two different or same person. Exception is the second FIR with a rival version to the first FIR and in the nature of counter complaint.
Shajan Skaria Versus The State of Kerala & Another (Supreme Court of India, 23-08-2024)
CBI BS & FC Mumbai Versus Manojdev Gokulchand Seksaria & Another (Supreme Court of India, 22-08-2024)
Kawakami, Shigeki & Others Versus Assistant Controller Of Patents & Designs (High Court of Delhi, 21-08-2024)
Rukhiya & Others Versus The Registrar, The appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New Delhi & Another (High Court of Judicature at Madras, 19-08-2024)
Mineral Area Development Authority & Another Versus M/s. Steel Authority of India & Others (Supreme Court of India, 14-08-2024)
Mohan Kumar Versus State(Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi) & Another (High Court of Delhi, 12-08-2024)
A. Kamala Versus The State & Others (High Court of Judicature at Madras, 09-08-2024)
Rajesh @ Sunil & Others Versus State of Kerala (08-08-2024, High Court of Kerala)
Jagdish Prasad Singh Versus State of Bihar & Others (Supreme Court of India, 08-08-2024)
Divvela Ramaiah & Another Versus Union of India & Another (High Court of Judicature at Bombay, 06-08-2024)
CDJ Law Journal is the No. 1 Internet based Law Reporter in India which provides to its subscribers the Current & Old Judgments of Supreme Court of India,
All Indian High Courts, Various Tribunals, Privy Council & Foreign Courts. Started in the year 2000.
The Journal covers Arbitration, Civil, Criminal, Constitution, Tax, Labour, Service, Motor Vehicle, Patent & Trade Mark, Company & Corporate, Divorce & Matrimonial,
Cyber Law and Consumer Cases. CDJ reporting Judgments from all the branches in Law Exhaustively.
We Are providing the online customer chat Support 24/7.
The CDJ Law Journal established in the year 2000 started to publish THE COMPLETE DIGITAL JUDGMENTS (CDJ) consisting of all the reportable judgments of Supreme Court of India and various Indian High courts and Foreign Courts daily through website, www.cdjlawjournal.com .
Data base from 1900 onwards
Full Text with Head Notes
Comparative Citations
Instant search and quick research for years togethe
Toll Free Number & Chat online for the Customer Support
CDJ CITATIONS – 05-10-2024 Constitution of India - Article 15 and Article 39 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 292 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offices Act, 2012 - Section 2(1)(d), Section 2(1)(da), Section 2(da), Section 14, Section 15, Section 19, Section 20, Section 21, Section 29, Section 30, Section 42A, Section 43, Section 44 - IT Act - Section 2(w), Section 67, Section 67A, Section 67B, Section 79 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules, 2020 - Rule 11 - prosecution establishes the possession or storage of child pornographic material and the failure on the part of the respondent in deleting, destroying or reporting the same, the foundational facts necessary to invoke the statutory presumption of culpable mental state could be said to have been prima facie established. [Just Rights for Children Alliance & Another Versus S. Harish & Others, The Honourable Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud & The Honourable Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala, Dt: 23-09-2024, CDJ 2024 SC 801]
CDJ CITATIONS – 04-10-2024 Constitution of India – Article 136 – Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 – Section 24, 25, 28, 36, 41, 18, 4(1), 13(1) - The percentage of deduction or the extent of area required to be set apart has to be assessed by the courts having regard to the size, shape, situation, user etc. of the lands acquired. It is essentially a kind of guess work the courts are expected to undertake. [Mala & Others Versus State of Punjab & Others, The Honourable Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi & The Honourable Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta, Dt: 17/08/2023, CDJ 2023 SC 741]
Order prohibiting assembly of five or more persons withdrawn: Delhi Police to SC
Delhi HC admits fresh plea challenging arrest of UNLF cadre by NIA
Statements against theists on pedestal of Periyar’s statue are provocative, says Madras HC
Don’t use the term ‘North Madras youth’ negatively, say Madras HC judges
CDJ Law Journal Is The No. 1 Internet Based Law Reporter In India Which Provides To Its Subscribers The Current & Old Judgments Of Supreme Court Of India, All Indian High Courts.